WSJ: "Republicans need to keep courting Jewish and black voters."VDARE: Make that counting!By Steve Sailer The battle to
spin the ethnic vote continues, with many
Republican commentators arguing that George W.
Bush's resounding failure among their favorite
minority constituencies only means that
Republicans should redouble their efforts to
appeal to that group in the next election. One of the most far-fetched was "Wall Street Journal" editorial page columnist Seth Lipsky's piece "No Majority Without Minorities: It won't be easy, but Republicans need to keep courting Jewish and black voters." The only
plausible Republican strategy for attracting
significant numbers of Jews or blacks is to
nominate a Jew or a black for President. And the
bounce from that would be short-lived, just as
regional pride enabled Jimmy Carter to carry
white Southerners in 1976, but not in 1980. An
article by Ralph Z. Hallow in The
Washington
Times
quoted a black Republican suggesting a more
hard-headed tactic for the GOP: payoffs to black
leaders. Former chairman of the U.S. Commission
on Civil Rights, William B. Allen advises
targeting black politicians and ministers.
"The time has come to recognize that the
Republican Party has to co-opt -- I may even say
to buy -- the black vote. … You make it too
valuable for them to say no to you. …
Everybody has something to offer, whether
positions, whether money, you name it." While
certainly a bracing alternative to Lipsky's
woozy wishing, Allen's plan probably wouldn't
work. Although the Democrats have been paying
"walking-around" money to black
ministers for decades, it is considered
scandalous when the GOP tries to match the
Democrats. Recall how political consultant Ed
Rollins sank his career by boasting that he'd
handed out walking-around money to New Jersey
ministers to get Christine Todd Whitman elected. Further,
Democrats can offer above-board policy payoffs
to black leaders that Republicans just can't
match, at least not without eliminating what
little difference is left between the parties. Consider
why the Bush Brothers didn't win easily in
Florida: because Governor Jeb infuriated the
black elite with his One Florida plan. When Ward
Connerly, the black hero of California's
anti-quota Proposition 209 campaign, came to
Florida, Jeb thunk and thunk and finally came up
with what he reckoned was the perfect plan to
squelch Connerly. Jeb
would eliminate overt racial preferences in
state university admissions, but actually
increase the number of black students by
guaranteeing college admission to any kid
finishing in the top 20% of his high school
class. Since lots of poor blacks attend schools
where even the valedictorian is hard pressed to
score above the national average on the SAT,
this would be a boon to black college
admissions. Of
course, what Jeb forgot was that black elites
are not comprised of average blacks. Black
leaders mostly send their kids to integrated
schools, where their scions find it hard to rank
in the top fifth. However, black leaders' kids
tend to outscore the poor black kids on the SAT,
so One Florida would tend to make affluent black
kids worse off to the benefit of their poorer
brethren. Enraged,
black leaders ran a tremendous get out the vote
campaign, driving the black share of the vote up
from 10% in Florida in 1996 to 15% in 2000. And
Florida's African Americans votes 93% to 7%
against Jeb's brother Dubya. Now, Mr. Lipsky might suggest that all Jeb had
to do was explain to poor black Floridians why
his plan was better for them than their leaders'
quota plan. Maybe … but let's be frank about
the difficulties of getting a complex logical
argument across to poor blacks. Consider
this: The only reason Dubya is carrying Florida
is because a sizable fraction of the black
electorate there botched up their ballots.
Although I implied in VDARE that the 26,000 ballots disqualified in
Republican Duval County showed that Republicans
could be as clueless as Democrats, I was wrong.
In Duval's black precincts, 20% of the voters
had their ballots disqualified for, well, for
stupidity. The get-out-the-vote workers had told
inexperienced black voters "to vote on
every page." Since the ten Presidential
candidates were spread across two pages, many
voted for two men for President. [See the
amusing New
York Times account].
Similarly, The Palm Beach Post reported that the butterfly ballot baffled 16% of
the voters in Palm Beach's black districts. In
contrast to Allen's interesting but probably
impractical idea, Donald J. Devine, a veteran
Republican campaign staffer suggested in The Washington Times article that the GOP not waste party resources on
blacks other than carefully selected
intellectuals. "Black intellectuals, on our
side at least, have made the black intellectuals
on the other side listen to our arguments on
school vouchers and other issues." Recall
the old joke: Q.
What do you call a black man at a Heritage
Foundation conference? A.
Keynote Speaker. [Steve Sailer [email him] is founder of the Human Biodiversity Institute and movie critic for The American Conservative. His website www.iSteve.blogspot.com features his daily blog.] Tomorrow: Part II - why black foreign policy strategists are good for the GOP and America; and the way out of the Republican ethnic dilemma. December 09, 2000 |
The articles on VDARE.com are brought to you by the VDARE Foundation. We are supported by generous donations from our readers. Contributions are tax deductible and appreciated. Contribute...
[Home] [Why VDARE.com / The White Doe?] [FAQ] [Blog] [e-Bulletins] [Contact Us] [VDARE.com People Pages] [Links] [Search] [Blog Search] [Archive] [Letters] [The VDARE Foundation] [Make A Tax-Deductible Contribution]
Copyright © 1999 - 2008 VDARE.com