September 07, 2003
NOTE: PLEASE say if you DON'T want your name and/or email address published when sending VDARE email.
From: Steven Piper [email him]
Re Schwarzenegger's talk show comments: In the Walnut Creek candidates' debate last Wednesday, State Senator Tom McClintock said in a particularly clear and firm voice, when asked by the reporter from La Opinion, Pilar something-or-other: "I supported 187, I campaigned for 187, I voted for it, and I continue to support 187." He is the ONLY major candidate who has done that. Arnold, who failed to attend, has done nothing but talk out of both sides of his mouth.
Needless to say, Tom also made it very explicit that he adamantly opposes Davis' latest bit of pandering: signing a bill, which he had vetoed twice previously, that will provide state drivers' licenses for illegal aliens.
Tom's campaign does emphasize the car tax, but three elements are involved, in my estimate:
He does after all have the blood of Scottish clans coursing through his veins.
P.S. If I could get in another shameless plug here, Tom is also the author of California's death penalty law.
Peter Brimelow comments: The more the merrier! Although VDARE.COM can't legally get involved in elections, we are certainly interested in any mention of our favorite issues. And Senator McClintock was indeed outspoken on illegal immigration in the debate and in subsequent interviews.
Curiously, however, his campaign website carried no report of his comments – or, indeed, anything on immigration at all. And we also hear nasty stories about McClintock's past comments on legal immigration.
Significantly, a San Jose Mercury News story this weekend was headlined "Immigration stokes new fire in recall race." [by Laura Kurtzman, September 6, 2003] But the text reveals, probably inadvertently, that this is because Democrats are using it to ignite their ethnic constituencies. The Republicans continue to back peddle. McClintock is not mentioned.
But, hey, as Schwarzenegger has said in criticizing Davis' switch on licensing illegals: "Now it's election time. Of course, everything changes." There's plenty of time for something to break lose.
That's why the political establishment hates elections and has so derided California's recall And why we should have recall provisions in every darn state.
In fact, how about nationally?