Robin Givhan In WaPo: It Was Racist of Chauvin to Worry That Blacks Might Riot
Print Friendly and PDF

Earlier by Ann Coulter: We Don't Believe The MSM On George Floyd, Because We KNOW They Lied About Rodney King

From the Washington Post’s critic-at-large:

The witness would not be described as angry

By Robin Givhan
Senior critic-at-large
March 30, 2021 at 4:14 p.m. PDT

… Defense attorney Eric Nelson has made anger central to his argument for Chauvin’s acquittal. In his version of events, the anger of the growing crowd on the street that May afternoon distracted Chauvin from the man he had pinned under his knee. Floyd, who had been accused of circulating a counterfeit $20 bill, was in Chauvin’s custody, which meant that he was also in his care. But the crowd — that dangerous, unruly mob, according to Nelson — had distracted Chauvin so that he could not attend to Floyd’s well-being. He could only concern himself with his detainment.

To that end, according to several witnesses, including Williams, the White police officer adjusted his knee to apply more pressure, to ensure that Floyd’s Black body remained immobile — until his immobility turned into unconsciousness.

The defense’s narrative makes use of one of the culture’s most damaging and enduring stereotypes about Black men — and women, too. These people ooze anger, and Black anger is inherently menacing. It isn’t justified or understandable or controlled, even when it is all of those things. It most certainly is not righteous. And when it rises, it must be tamped down, defused and crushed.

Perhaps Chauvin was worried that something like this might happen?

[Comment at]
Print Friendly and PDF